I was wondering why this happened, what I can do to fix it, and if two pad mode will somehow act up again. When I switch back and fourth now, four pad mode still has the reset issue and two pad mode remains normal. (The G5 has a feature where you have to wait for a few seconds after you stop the timer to reset the time, and during that time that you cannot stop the timer the time blinks on the screen.) After that I switched to four pad mode and now four pad mode has the reset button issue and two pad mode does not have anymore issues. Then, once I switched back to two pad mode (the timer defaults to four pad mode) the problem went away, but the reset button could reset right away after a solve and the time didn't blink. I switched to two pad mode again and the problem happened again. Today I decided to use it (on two pad mode) and when I stopped the timer it displayed 888:888 and when I hit the power on button the timer went to four pad mode, which is its default mode. If it happens during a competition the only thing that can be done is a resolve.So I've had a stack at G5 for about a year, and I replaced its batteries only once about a month ago. At this stage I believe we are waiting on advice from Speedstacks as to what's going on with the timers resetting, as it will be a major problem for them too. Naturally, due to the issues that became obvious at USnats with the timers resetting, there is a big problem that has to be dealt with. For now both timers are acceptable, and I suspect it will stay this way for at least 2 or 3 years. I don't think there was any agreement as to when is the best time to truncate during a competition, but all averages will be worked out with the truncated times (I think the best thing is for the judge to write down the whole time, including thousandths of a second, and the person doing data entry can truncate).Īt some stage in the future the generation 2 timers will be phased out, but no date has been set for that. The thousandth of a second digit will be truncated, not rounded. We will not use thousandths of a second at any time in the forseeable future. I am not making an official statement, but this is the general consensus: I can assure you the delegates have been addressing everything regarding the gen3 timers. (Sorry if there are typos, it's like 2:30 in the morning haha) So, people could realize that they are having a bad solve and intentionally stop the timer with unnecessary force in the hopes of getting a new scramble.īasically, I'm just confused about what exactly the procedures are for the new gen 3 timers and also bringing up some problems that they pose. I notice that the timer only resets when hit with a good bit of force, even though it is not stopped unreasonably forcefully. In a way, it's similar to the POP rule where people could potentially make their cube POP on a bad solve in order to get a new scramble. However, if this is a common occurrence, it could cause major problems. Just hold the RESET button for 5 seconds to switch modes. Other G5 features include: Two operation modes: 4-Pad (for stacking) and 2-Pad (for speed cubing). Is the competitor awarded another solve? I believe this is the case based on Article 11 of the WCA Regulations. The patented four-pad activation system eliminates a whole class of scratches by ensuring that hands can’t be holding cups when starting and stopping the timer. This happens significantly more frequently than with the gen 2 timers. Sometimes, when stopping the gen 3 timers, it resets to 0 despite the reset button never being pressed (at least in my experience with 3 gen 3 timers). And of course, having some kind of standardization (possibly outlined in the WCA Regulations?) is good for keeping consistency as far as calculating the results.Īnother question/problem I have is stopping the timer. Is that recorded as 12.348 (actual time), 12.34 (time on external display, truncated), or 12.35 (time to the hundredths (rounded)? How exactly are averages calculated using this system? Assuming times are recorded in full to the thousandth, does one round the times (to the hundredth) before calculating the average or after calculating the average? While often negligible, this could make a difference in someones average if only by a hundredth. What is the procedure for recording times off of a gen 3 timer? For example, a time of 12.348. Is the WCA going to eventually have to make the transition from gen 2 to gen 3 timers? Does the WCA prefer one type of timer over another? If the WCA prefers the gen 2 timer, is there still a way to purchase new gen 2 timers? Also, at US Nationals this year, there were gen 3 timers that were used. As far as I am aware, the gen 2 timers are no longer available for purchase from the Speedstack website because they are only selling gen 3 timers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |